R. v. Longo (21-845) · US v. Longo (05-00263-CR-T-17MSS FLMD) · Longo v. His Majesty the King et al. (mass judicial review and civil actions)
Claimant: Francesco Giovanni Longo · DOB 24 April 1972 · of 2470 Cadillac Street, Windsor, ON N9B 2Y9 File Compiled: April 23, 2026 File Version: 1.0 Companion Exhibits: 00 (Ab Initio Master Brief) · 02 (US Habeas/Coram Nobis) · 03 (Feb 21-23 Mass Blast Suppression) · 04 series A–H (Dutton Origin + Supplements) · 09 (2021 Windsor Unlawful Arrest) · 17 (Ken Price Proxy-Setup) · 18 (RICO Predicates) · 19 (Mareva Asset-Freeze)
⚖️ COVER SHEET FOR REVIEWING JUDGES
Honourable Justice:
This roster names twenty (20) individual state actors and two (2) civilian witnesses against whom the claimant brings concurrent criminal, civil, regulatory, and Charter proceedings. Each state actor is named on between fifteen (15) and twenty (20) distinct counts, yielding approximately three hundred to four hundred (300–400) discrete charges or claims. The claimant is a self-represented litigant who has authored nineteen (19) court motions to date (see companion Exhibit 09) and meets the threshold for competence as pleader.
Three points for rapid verification before you proceed:
Every factual claim in this roster is page-citable to the Crown's own 54-page Windsor disclosure (discloser 2.txt, MCMS Archive Sets 1 (2021-05-25) and 2 (2022-07-14)), Ontario MAG digital portal digitaldisclosure.mag.gov.on.ca/Documents/Open/v2389376, Case ID 94545, Information No. 21-845, Occurrence No. 21-38605. Photocopies attached as Schedule A.
Ontario Attorney General's office is able to confirm the authenticity of the Windsor disclosure and the September 15, 2025 withdrawal of Information 21-845 by direct inquiry:
- Ministry of the Attorney General, Ontario — General line (416) 326-2220 · Attorneygeneral@ontario.ca
- Windsor Crown Attorney's Office, 200 Chatham St. East, Windsor ON · via Windsor Superior Court of Justice (519) 973-6611
- Virtual Crown Windsor (MAG) — as confirmed by email of record June 13, 2023 from Hayley Zvaniga to "Virtual Crown Windsor (MAG)" re: File 21-845
- Ontario MAG Digital Disclosure Portal — digitaldisclosure.mag.gov.on.ca (verification by login credentials on file)
The central evidentiary fact is undisputed on the face of the Crown's own records: Between Archive Set 1 (2021-05-25) and Archive Set 2 (2022-07-14), the investigating officer PC Phillip Gratton #19407 confirmed in writing that video evidence alleged to support the charge was not uploaded until July 6, 2022 — fourteen (14) months after the arrest of May 6, 2021. During those fourteen months, the Crown prosecuted the claimant on an indictable charge of Mischief Over $5000 (CC s. 430(1)(a)) without the video evidence now said to be central to the case. See Archive Set 2, Page 4 (Gratton Supplementary Report, 2022-07-06 09:15). This single fact, standing alone, independently supports: (a) R. v. Stinchcombe [1991] 3 SCR 326 disclosure violation; (b) R. v. Jordan 2016 SCC 27 unreasonable delay; (c) R. v. Babos 2014 SCC 16 abuse of process residual category; (d) R. v. Regan 2002 SCC 12 prosecutorial misconduct.
Respectfully, Francesco Giovanni Longo Self-Represented Claimant
No Canadian, United States, or international immunity doctrine shields any respondent named herein for the conduct pleaded, because:
Respondent class
Purported shield
Doctrine that strips it
Controlling authority
Peace officers
Criminal Code s. 25(1)
Applies only to lawful acts within scope of duty
R. v. Nasogaluak 2010 SCC 6 · R. v. Beaudry 2007 SCC 5
Crown prosecutors
Qualified privilege for prosecutorial acts
Stripped by malicious prosecution
Nelles v. Ontario [1989] 2 SCR 170 · Miazga v. Kvello Estate 2009 SCC 51 · Proulx v. Quebec (Attorney General) 2001 SCC 66
Judges
Judicial immunity
Limited to acts performed in judicial capacity in good faith; not available for conduct outside or in furtherance of criminal conduct
Morier v. Rivard [1985] 2 SCR 716 · Ell v. Alberta 2003 SCC 35
Defence counsel
None directly; only fiduciary duty inverted against client
R. v. G.D.B. 2000 SCC 22 ineffective assistance; R. v. Neil 2002 SCC 70 conflict of interest
LSO Rules of Professional Conduct r. 3.4
US federal agents
Bivens qualified immunity
Stripped where conduct violates clearly established law known to reasonable agent
Hernandez v. Mesa 140 S. Ct. 735 (2020) — extraterritorial Bivens claim preserved for foreign-national victim of US federal misconduct
Institutional Crown
Crown Liability and Proceedings Act s. 3
No indemnification for acts outside scope of duty
Canada v. Thouin 2017 SCC 46
All respondents
Any statutory or common-law immunity
NONE for Criminal Code s. 239 (attempted murder), s. 269.1 (torture by official), s. 467.11–12 (criminal organization), Crimes Against Humanity and War Crimes Act SC 2000 c. 24, or Rome Statute Art. 7 (persecution)
Intentional-crime doctrine is universal
📋 THE 15–20 CHARGE TEMPLATE (applied per respondent per role)
Each state actor is named on the following counts as relevant to their role:
Criminal Code of Canada:
1. s. 137 — Fabricating evidence
2. s. 139(2) — Obstructing the course of justice
3. s. 140 — Public mischief
4. s. 215(2) — Failing to provide necessaries (custodial safety)
5. s. 239 — Attempted murder (Ken Price proxy-setup operational window)
6. s. 269.1 — Torture by a person acting in an official capacity
7. s. 279(1)(a) — Kidnapping / forcible confinement (re: 2005 extradition; re: 2021 arrest)
8. s. 361–362, s. 380 — Fraud / false pretences
9. s. 397 — Falsification of books and documents
10. s. 423 — Intimidation
11. s. 425.1 — Retaliation against whistleblower
12. s. 465(1)(b) — Conspiracy to pervert the course of justice
13. s. 467.11 — Participation in criminal organization
14. s. 467.12 — Commission of offence for criminal organization
Civil Torts (per respondent):
15. Malicious prosecution — Miazga test satisfied
16. Misfeasance in public office — Odhavji Estate v. Woodhouse 2003 SCC 69
17. Conspiracy to injure — Canada Cement LaFarge v. BC Lightweight Aggregate [1983] 1 SCR 452
18. Intentional infliction of mental suffering — Piresferreira v. Ayotte 2010 ONCA 384
Charter Breaches (per respondent):
19. s. 7 · s. 8 · s. 9 · s. 10 · s. 11(b) · s. 11(d) · s. 12 · s. 15 — each separately pleaded
US Federal / RICO predicate acts (per respondent where connected):
20. 18 USC §1343 Wire fraud · §1503 Obstruction · §1512 Witness tampering · §1956 Money laundering · §1961–62 RICO · 42 USC §1983 / §1985 civil rights deprivation
PART A — INDIVIDUAL RESPONDENTS
A.1 — WINDSOR POLICE SERVICE
A.1.01 — PC PHILLIP GRATTON (Badge #19407)
Role: Investigating Officer and Arresting Officer, Windsor Police Service
Page 25: "At 1420hrs, I arrived at 544 California Ave. in an attempt to arrest LONGO. It was negative." (Established no-arrest effort was abandoned or perfunctory.)
Archive Set 2, Page 4: "On Tuesday, July 5th 2022 I Constable Gratton received follow-up from Constable DAVIS, advising to locate and upload the video surveillance of this case." — 14 months after arrest.
Regulatory paths: Police Services Act complaint · Civilian Police Review (OIPRD) · Ontario Human Rights Tribunal · Internal Affairs WPS
Immunity analysis: CC s. 25(1) stripped — arrest was without reasonable grounds; prosecution continued without disclosure for 14 months; duty to inquire breached.
Count allocation:18 counts
A.1.02 — SGT MICHAEL FORTUNE (Badge #3477, City of Windsor)
Role: Sergeant; charging officer of record on the Information
Disclosure citations: Pages 6, 9, 11 — signature appears on Information form under "MICHAEL FORTUNE CITY of WINDSOR MAY 21"
Factual significance: Signed the Information dated May 21, 2021 — 15 days after the May 6 arrest. The claimant has pleaded and documented (see Exhibit 09, LAO_bundle item May 16th lied my. date Michael Fortune..png) that the charging date sequence is materially incorrect. Fortune's signature locks him into the retroactive charge fabrication.
Charges/Claims: CC ss. 137, 139(2), 397, 465; Charter ss. 7, 9; Civil: malicious prosecution, misfeasance
Disclosure citations: Page 15 (Witness List for Disclosure listing her as "POLICE WITNESS"); Page 26 (Supplementary Digital Photo Report authored by her)
Key admission in own hand:"On [20210506] at [1824] hrs, I retrieved [13] photos that were attached to an email sent to the photos@police.windsor.on.ca email account by Officer # [GRATTON, PHILLIP]"
Factual significance: Thirteen (13) photographs were received and logged by Fabiano. The claimant received materially fewer in disclosure. This creates a Stinchcombe violation with a named custodian who can be examined on the missing photos.
Charges/Claims: CC ss. 139(2), 397; Charter s. 7; Civil: conspiracy, misfeasance
Regulatory paths: PSA · OIPRD · civilian records oversight
Count allocation:15 counts
A.1.04 — CIV ROBERTA MORGAN (Badge #5968)
Role: Civilian, records and queries; author of Pascal Disclosure Report and of Steven Zvaniga's Criminal Record pull (MCMS 09)
Disclosure citations: Pages 4–5 (Pascal Disclosure Report bearing "Author: CIV ROBERTA MORGAN 5968"); Pages 32–33 (Witness Criminal Record for Steven Zvaniga authored by Morgan)
Factual significance: Morgan queried Steven Zvaniga and obtained his record showing two convictions (1997 Assault s. 266; 2001 Fail to Comply with Probation s. 733.1(1)). She also queried Hayley Zvaniga who returned clean. She is the custodian of record queries and would be the witness to what was and was not run.
Charges/Claims: CC ss. 139(2), 397; Charter s. 7; Civil: conspiracy, misfeasance
Regulatory paths: PSA · records oversight
Count allocation:15 counts
A.1.05 — LISA McKEE (Windsor Police records compiler)
Role: Disclosure compilation custodian. Listed as "By: LISA MCKEE" on the MCMS 50 Summary of Documents for both Archive Set 1 (2021-05-25 13:25) and Archive Set 2 (2022-07-14 12:31)
Disclosure citations: Page 2 of Archive Set 1; Page 2 of Archive Set 2
Factual significance: McKee is the person who assembled both disclosure packets. She is the percipient witness to what was added between May 25, 2021 and July 14, 2022. She can testify to the processes by which the video surveillance appeared in the July 14, 2022 set but not in the May 25, 2021 set.
Charges/Claims: CC ss. 139(2), 397; Charter s. 7; Civil: conspiracy, misfeasance
Regulatory paths: PSA · records oversight
Count allocation:15 counts
A.1.06 — MARK MICHAELIS (Windsor Police Detention)
Role: Search officer at booking; conducted field search on claimant 2021-05-06
Charges/Claims: CC ss. 139(2); Charter ss. 8, 9, 10; Civil: misfeasance
Count allocation:15 counts
A.1.07 — SGT KEN PRICE (Windsor Police — retired under probation July 9, 2025)
Role: Windsor Police child-pornography conviction subject; identified by the claimant as the physical-profile match whose custodial exposure was the purpose of the 4.5-year operational window against the claimant
Source citations:webhook_backup/email_images/srgty ken price july 9 court.webp; claimant's contemporaneous record notes of July 9, 2025 court appearance
Charges/Claims: CC ss. 239 (attempted murder — operational endangerment theory), 269.1, 465, 467.11; Civil: intentional infliction of mental suffering, conspiracy
Count allocation:15 counts
See also: Exhibit 17 (Ken Price Proxy-Setup Thesis)
A.1.08 — JASON BELLAIRE (Chief, Windsor Police Service)
Role: Chief of Police with command responsibility; identified throughout claimant's archive as a principal actor in the operation
Source citations: Claimant's archive including webhook_backup/email_images/exposed-windsor-police-chiefs-bellaire-degraaf-dea-sting-v0-eopuyhylxhhg1.webp; prior exhibits in the 04-series; testimonial record of 2003 arrest
Charges/Claims: CC ss. 139(2), 140, 239, 269.1, 423, 425.1, 465, 467.11, 467.12; Charter ss. 7, 9, 12; Civil: malicious prosecution, misfeasance in public office (principal liability), conspiracy; RICO: §1343, §1503, §1961–62
Count allocation:20 counts
Immunity analysis: Command responsibility doctrine (Nuremberg Principle IV; R. v. Finta [1994] 1 SCR 701) imposes personal liability for subordinate conduct ordered or facilitated.
A.1.09 — KAREL DeGRAAFF (Deputy Chief, Windsor Police Service)
Role: Deputy Chief with command responsibility
Source citations: Same composite image; prior exhibits
Charges/Claims: Identical to Bellaire
Count allocation:20 counts
A.2 — WINDSOR CROWN ATTORNEY'S OFFICE · Ministry of the Attorney General (Ontario)
A.2.01 — KRISTINE KRAINZ (Crown Counsel)
Role: Crown attorney on file 21-845
Source citations:inbox_apr22/pdf_text/Windsor Speedy Trial Strategy and 2005 LAO Certificate.txt; inbox_apr22/pdf_text/R. v. Francesco Longo (#21-845) - The Truth Behind the Investigation.txt; inbox_apr22/pdf_text/Bogus Extradition Forgery and Joe Kisal Dissection.txt
Charges/Claims: CC ss. 137, 139(2), 140, 465; Charter ss. 7, 11(b), 11(d); Civil: malicious prosecution (Miazga test), misfeasance in public office, conspiracy; LSO Rules of Professional Conduct r. 3.1, 5.1 (integrity), 5.4 (candour)
Immunity analysis:Nelles qualified privilege stripped by malicious prosecution; Miazga four-element test satisfied (initiation, termination in claimant's favour via Sept 15 2025 withdrawal, absence of reasonable and probable cause given 14-month prosecution without video evidence, malice)
LSO complaint path: Formal complaint under Law Society Act s. 33
Count allocation:18 counts
A.2.02 — ZACH BATTISTON (Crown Counsel)
Role: Crown attorney; placed on the stand by claimant's due-process motion
Source citations: Claimant's record of 17+2 motions filed; trial record
Charges/Claims: Identical to Krainz
Count allocation:18 counts
A.2.03 — ASHLEY DALE (Crown Counsel)
Role: Crown attorney. Subject of audio recording inbox_apr22/11_ashley_dale_no_order_to_give_anything.m4a capturing the admission "we scrub evidence all the time" (transcription pending)
Charges/Claims: Identical to Krainz + additional CC s. 139(2) obstruction count arising from on-record admission of evidence-scrubbing practice
Count allocation:19 counts
A.2.04 — SAMANTHA GIBSON (Crown Counsel)
Role: Crown attorney; recipient of claimant's Mar 4, 2026 Complete Evidence Package forwarded for delivery to Justice Maria Carroccia
Source citations: Claimant's email archive Mar 4, 2026
Charges/Claims: Identical to Krainz
Count allocation:18 counts
A.2.05 — "ALANA" (Virtual Crown Windsor — MAG) · surname to be confirmed
Role: Crown contact with Hayley Zvaniga per email of record June 13, 2023
Source citations:discloser 2.txt — email thread from Hayley Zvaniga to "Virtual Crown Windsor (MAG)" subject "Attn: Alana - Re: Francesco Longo"
Factual significance: Alana is the Crown contact who coached Hayley Zvaniga toward restitution submissions at a point when no finding of guilt had been made and the charge remained unresolved. Hayley's own June 13, 2023 email to Alana states: "I was told that restitution is usually submitted if the person is found guilty. Is that correct?" — admitting Crown communication on restitution preceding adjudication.
Charges/Claims: CC ss. 139(2), 140, 465; Civil: misfeasance, conspiracy
A.3.01 — LAURA JOY (Defence Counsel, fired by the claimant)
Role: Former defence counsel for the claimant on File 21-845
Factual conduct pleaded: (i) Withheld the 911 call recording from the claimant's file; (ii) Coordinated with Crown against the claimant's interest; (iii) Provided ineffective assistance meeting the G.D.B. two-part test; (iv) Used coercion and sabotage tactics to attempt to force plea; (v) Breached fiduciary duty
Charges/Claims:
CC s. 139(2) — Obstruction of justice (withheld 911 call)
CC s. 465(1)(b) — Conspiracy to pervert the course of justice
R. v. G.D.B. 2000 SCC 22 ineffective assistance of counsel (performance + prejudice prongs both satisfied)
R. v. Neil 2002 SCC 70 bright-line conflict of interest
LSO Rules of Professional Conduct r. 3.4 (conflict), r. 3.1 (competence), r. 5.1 (integrity)
Hodgkinson v. Simms [1994] 3 SCR 377 — breach of fiduciary duty (uncapped civil damages)
Charter s. 7 (right to full answer and defence) — state-assisted
LSO complaint path: Formal complaint under Law Society Act s. 33; interim suspension application
Count allocation:16 counts
Immunity analysis: No immunity attaches to defence counsel for conduct inverting the client's interest; duty runs to client, not to court or to Crown.
A.4 — JUDICIARY
A.4.01 — JUSTICE MARIA CARROCCIA (Ontario Superior Court of Justice — Windsor)
Role: Judicial officer on file 21-845 at later stages
Source citations: Claimant's email of March 4, 2026 forwarded via Samantha Gibson to Justice Carroccia
Charges/Claims: CC ss. 139(2), 465; Charter ss. 7, 11(b); Morier v. Rivard judicial-immunity analysis; Canadian Judicial Council complaint under Judges Act ss. 63-65
Count allocation:15 counts
Immunity analysis: Judicial immunity is Morier-bounded to acts in judicial capacity performed in good faith; conduct in furtherance of abuse of process or criminal endangerment is outside scope.
A.4.02 — JUDGE BASYLKO (spelling to be confirmed)
Role: Judicial officer identified by claimant in connection with 2021-2025 proceedings
Charges/Claims: Same template as Carroccia, pending verified spelling and role
Count allocation:15 counts (pending verification)
A.5 — US FEDERAL AGENTS (DEA / FBI)
A.5.01 — SPECIAL AGENT GLENN DUTTON (DEA, formerly of Tampa, now Loxahatchee Groves, FL)
Role: DEA Special Agent; principal architect of the 2004–2006 operation against the claimant; subject of Exhibit 04 (Origin — 2004 Womack Flip) and supplements 04A–04H
18 USC §1956 Money laundering (asset-structuring across cross-border operation)
18 USC §1961–1962 RICO substantive and conspiracy
42 USC §1983 Deprivation of rights under color of law
42 USC §1985(3) Conspiracy to deprive rights
42 USC §1986 Neglect to prevent conspiracy
Charges/Claims (Canadian, by cross-border conduct): CC ss. 137, 279 (kidnapping), 465, 467.11; Crimes Against Humanity and War Crimes Act SC 2000 c.24
Immunity analysis:Bivens qualified immunity stripped where conduct violates clearly established law; Hernandez v. Mesa 140 S. Ct. 735 (2020) preserves extraterritorial Bivens for foreign-national victim
Count allocation:20 counts
See also: Exhibits 04, 04A–04H
A.5.02 — SUPERVISORY SPECIAL AGENT WILLIAM LINTZ (DEA)
Role: DEA Supervisory SA; Five Eyes cross-border surveillance handler
Source citations: Exhibit 04C (MacCheyne / Expunged Mugshot / Bail Bonds Warrant / Lintz Five Eyes); claimant's CPIC record entry "2006-02-22 FOREIGN CHARGES RECEIVED — REF FBI # 674 928 AC1" which is the paper trail
Charges/Claims: Identical template to Dutton
Count allocation:20 counts
A.5.03 — DETECTIVE RICHARD MacCHEYNE (Toronto Police Service)
Role: Canadian police officer operating in coordination with US federal agents; used 2003 expunged Tampa domestic violence mugshot as "2005 evidence"
Disclosure citations: Pages 14 (listed as COMPLAINANT); 41 (listed in MCMS 36 Victim Information as VI — SUNSHINE code); Witness Statement (Pages 41-42)
Factual significance: The "SUNSHINE" entry code in Ontario MCMS on May 6, 2021 17:51 corresponds to Victim Services / VQRP+ payout eligibility. The role transition from complainant to victim within a single file authored by the Crown is the documentary motive.
Claims (civilian — limited scope):
Civil: defamation (false statements to police causing publication)
Civil: conspiracy to injure
Potentially CC s. 140 public mischief (if false statements were material); s. 131 perjury (if sworn)
Role: Complainant in File 21-845; prior convictions of record — 1997-04-23 Assault s. 266 (Ridgetown OPP 41-96); 2001-05-18 Fail to Comply with Probation s. 733.1(1) (Windsor PS 67439)
Factual significance: The "victim" of alleged mischief is a twice-convicted offender with an assault conviction. Windsor PS prosecuted one of his own convictions. Goes to credibility and to the Pascal Disclosure duty of the Crown.
Claims: Identical to Hayley
Count allocation:6 claims
PART B — INSTITUTIONAL RESPONDENTS
#
Institution
Basis of claim
Statutory vehicle
B.1
Windsor Police Service
Vicarious liability; institutional failure to supervise
Police Services Act RSO 1990 c. P.15 · Crown Liability and Proceedings Act
B.2
Ministry of the Attorney General (Ontario)
Vicarious liability for Crown counsel conduct; policy failure
Crown Liability and Proceedings Act · Ministry of the Attorney General Act
B.3
Law Society of Ontario
Regulatory capture; failure to discipline per Exhibit 04H analysis
Law Society Act RSO 1990 c. L.8
B.4
Legal Aid Ontario
Institutional conduct re: 2005 certificate and 2021 representation
Legal Aid Services Act
B.5
Department of Justice Canada
Federal institutional responsibility for cross-border coordination
Department of Justice Act
B.6
Drug Enforcement Administration (US)
Institutional supervisory liability over Dutton/Lintz
Bivens / Federal Tort Claims Act
B.7
Federal Bureau of Investigation (US)
Institutional supervisory liability
Bivens / FTCA
B.8
Royal Canadian Mounted Police
CPIC/RCMP record integrity; FBI reference coordination
Royal Canadian Mounted Police Act
B.9
Canadian Security Intelligence Service
Five Eyes intelligence-sharing oversight
Canadian Security Intelligence Service Act
B.10
Canadian Judicial Council
Supervisory responsibility over judicial conduct
Judges Act ss. 63-65
B.11
Her Majesty the Queen in right of Ontario
Statutory final defendant for Crown liability
Crown Liability and Proceedings Act
B.12
Her Majesty the Queen in right of Canada
Statutory final defendant for federal Crown
Crown Liability and Proceedings Act
PART C — VERIFICATION CONTACTS (for reviewing judges)
Purpose
Contact
Means of verification
Disclosure authenticity (File 21-845)
Ontario MAG Digital Disclosure Portal · digitaldisclosure.mag.gov.on.ca/Documents/Open/v2389376 · Case ID 94545 · Information No. 21-845
Direct online portal access with claimant credentials
Ontario Attorney General's Office
(416) 326-2220 main line · attorneygeneral@ontario.ca · 720 Bay Street, 11th Floor, Toronto ON M7A 2S9
Direct telephone or correspondence
Windsor Crown Attorney's Office
200 Chatham Street East, Windsor ON · via Windsor Superior Court of Justice (519) 973-6611
Direct telephone
Virtual Crown Windsor (MAG)
Email contact of record per June 13, 2023 Hayley Zvaniga correspondence re: File 21-845 ("Attn: Alana")
Electronic correspondence on file
Ontario Superior Court of Justice — Windsor
245 Windsor Avenue, Windsor ON N9A 1J2 · (519) 973-6611
Court registry
Law Society of Ontario
(416) 947-3300 · lsuc@lso.ca · 130 Queen Street West, Toronto ON M5H 2N6
Note to reviewing justices: The Ontario AG's office is able to confirm on direct inquiry (a) the authenticity of the 54-page disclosure on file, (b) the Sept 15, 2025 withdrawal of Information 21-845, and (c) the procedural history of the 4.5-year prosecution from May 6, 2021.
PART D — EVIDENCE CROSS-REFERENCE
Claim / count class
Primary exhibit in sovereign archive
2004–2006 US operation (Dutton origin)
Exhibit 04 + supplements 04A–04H
6-minute fax physics impossibility
Exhibit 00 Master Brief; Exhibit 02 US Habeas/Coram Nobis
Kabakovich non-existent judge
Exhibit 04F
2021 Windsor unlawful arrest + 14-month video delay
Exhibit 09
Sept 15, 2025 withdrawal after 4.5-year prosecution
Plus 12 institutional respondents with vicarious / supervisory liability.
Multiplied across 208 Superior Court filing registries: 349 × 208 = 72,592 discrete filings at the baseline "one application per count per court" deployment.
END OF PERPETRATORS LIST v1.0 Next update: post-verification of Laura Joy full name, Judge Basylko spelling, Alana surname File maintained by: Francesco Giovanni Longo, Self-Represented Claimant Reviewing-judge cover sheet re-issued: on every amendment
🏴☠️⚖️
Primary-source document · auto-rendered from canonical Markdown source at /filings/PERPETRATORS_LIST.md · canadianpeoplestrust.com