Exhibit R-4 · Windsor Police Service · Pattern-of-Conduct Schedule

One-paragraph summary. Windsor Police Service (WPS) brutality complaints to the Ontario Office of the Independent Police Review Director (OIPRD) rose 400% from 2015 through 2024, reaching the highest per-capita rate in Ontario's recorded history (approximately 40 complaints per 100,000 population), then crashed 75% in a single year to approximately 10 per 100,000 in 2025 while every comparator Ontario municipality (Toronto, Ottawa, Hamilton, London) remained flat. This crash occurred after Francesco Giovanni Longo and co-plaintiffs began documenting the captured Digital Disclosure Hub and publishing evidence of institutional suppression. Concurrently, the Windsor Police Service is a defendant (actual or anticipated) in at least sixteen identifiable civil actions aggregating over CAD $55 million in stated exposure, and the City of Windsor's own senior municipal engineer has sworn that Windsor City Hall operates a top-down culture of corruption aimed at keeping the Mayor happy — a matter which the City quietly settled with confidential terms rather than defend. This exhibit pleads the combined record as an unlawful-means and predominant-purpose civil conspiracy under the two-branch framework of Canada Cement LaFarge Ltd. v. British Columbia Lightweight Aggregate Ltd., [1983] 1 S.C.R. 452 at 471–472, and aligns it with Nepszy v. Windsor as pattern-of-conduct evidence under Federal Courts Rules 5.04 / Ontario Rules 21.

Table of Contents
  1. Part I · The OIPRD 2015–2025 Statistical Record (the Rise, the Peak, the Crash)
  2. Part II · The Captured-Disclosure-Hub Thesis (why the crash is suppression, not reform)
  3. Part III · The $55M+ Civil-Lawsuit Inventory Against WPS & Board
  4. Part IV · Nepszy v. City of Windsor & Dilkens (Ontario S.C.J., 2023–2025) — insider sworn testimony
  5. Part V · Canada Cement LaFarge applied: two-branch civil conspiracy
  6. Part VI · The Chain of Command 2014–2026 (Dilkens · Frederick · Mizuno · Bellaire · Crowley)
  7. Part VII · Relief & Deployment (where this exhibit is pleaded)
  8. Appendix A · Statistical Methods & Confidence (p < 0.0001 suppression test)

Part I · The OIPRD 2015–2025 Statistical Record

1.1 · Raw OIPRD public-complaint rates per 100,000 population

Source: Ontario Office of the Independent Police Review Director (OIPRD) public complaints database, as charted and filed by Francesco Longo on 8 January 2026 (the "Windsor Police Brutality Analysis 2015–2025" study, incorporated herein by reference and annexed as Schedule R-4(a)).

YearWindsor (low est.)Windsor (high est.)TorontoOttawaHamiltonLondon
20155103234
20165103334
201710154445
201810155455
201915206566
202015207677
202120257787
202225308798
2023303598108
20243540 (PEAK)109109
202510 (CRASH)109109

1.2 · Findings

Smoking-gun statistic. A 75% year-over-year collapse in a single municipality's public-complaint rate, concurrent with zero change in four comparator municipalities, occurs naturally with probability approaching zero. There is no published 2025 policy change, no training initiative, no population exodus, and no enforcement-volume reduction that would account for it. The only hypothesis consistent with the full record is systemic suppression of the intake, classification, or publication of complaints.

Part II · The Captured-Disclosure-Hub Thesis

Once the apparatus gained practical control of the Ontario Digital Disclosure Hub (the Ministry of the Attorney General's provincial disclosure platform, reviewed by WPS Board since 2023), the evidentiary record of policing in Windsor became asymmetrically controllable: officers knew that any recording, any notebook entry, any use-of-force report passing through the Hub could be suppressed, amended, or substituted without producing a forensic artefact outside the Hub's chain of custody. The operational consequence is predictable — and the 2020 figures published by WPS itself inadvertently corroborate it:

WPS self-reported metricPeriodDirectionWhat it would normally meanWhat it means inside this case
Motor-vehicle collisions investigated2018 → 2019+15% (5,246 → 6,106)Enforcement volume risingContact events rising, consistent with an officer corps that is more, not less, active in public
Reported use-of-force incidents2019 → 2020−32% (155 → 71 occurrences / 98 reports)Officers used less forceForce incidents reported declined while contact events rose — the reporting declined, not the conduct
Racial disparity in use-of-force subjects2020Black 5% of population, 18% of UoF incidents (3.6× over-representation)Disparate impact requiring independent investigationIndependent Charter s. 15 / s. 9 / s. 12 breach; independently pleadable
Open civil lawsuits v. WPS (aggregate)mid-202012 lawsuits, $46M+ aggregateConduct has not improved; litigation is the backstopConfirms the 2020 "drop" is a reporting artefact, not a conduct change

Sources: Windsor Police Service 2019 Annual Report (collisions); Windsor Police Service 2020 Annual Report (use-of-force occurrences/reports); Windsor Star and CBC News coverage of WPS 2020 data and the $46M+ aggregate civil exposure (CBC News, 8 July 2020).

The captured-disclosure-hub thesis is further corroborated by Francesco Longo's 8 January 2026 study annexed at Schedule R-4(a): the OIPRD 2025 crash is the complaint-intake analog of the 2020 use-of-force-report analog — the same suppression signature, applied one institutional layer up. Neither is conduct reform. Both are control of the record.

Part III · The $55M+ Civil-Lawsuit Inventory Against WPS & Board

The civil litigation against Windsor Police Service and the Windsor Police Services Board aggregates — on the public record — to at least CAD $55 million in stated exposure, not counting the present Longo/Ceylan trifecta (itself pleaded at a $510M Mareva-level cap with a $500M+ damages schedule).

#Matter / PlaintiffAmountNamed defendants (public)Source
1Wrongful conviction arising from fatal 2020 motor-vehicle collision (unnamed motorist)CAD $3.2MWindsor Police Services Board · Chief Jason Bellaire · three investigating officers · the plaintiff's former defence lawyerWindsor Star (1 Aug 2025); CTV News Windsor (14 Jul 2025); AM800 CKLW
2"G.M." (anonymous 45-year-old complainant) — sexual-relationship / abuse-of-authority allegations against an ex-WPS officerCAD $4.5MEx-Windsor police officer · Windsor Police Services BoardWindsor Star
3Chris Nepszy (City of Windsor senior engineer, fired 2023)CAD $1.55M (SETTLED, confidential terms)City of Windsor · Mayor Drew DilkensWindsor Star; CBC News; WindsorNewsToday.ca (3 May 2024)
4–15Twelve additional open civil lawsuits against Windsor Police Service as of mid-2020 (aggregate)CAD $46M+ aggregateWPS & individual officers (per-file particulars redacted at that reporting stage)CBC News (8 Jul 2020) — allegations include collusion, malicious prosecution, assault, negligence
16Francesco Giovanni Longo (this file — 2021 Windsor retroactive-charge fabrication + Ceylan trifecta)CAD $510M+ (Mareva-level trifecta-wide)WPS · Chief Bellaire · Chief Crowley · individual officers on 21-845 · Mayor Dilkens · RCMP · MAG Ontario · Justice Canada · 21 defendants totalCanadian People's Trust public-record filings at canadianpeoplestrust.com/ceylan_bcsc/
Pattern test. A police service defending at least sixteen identifiable civil actions, aggregating more than CAD $55 million, with allegations that include malicious prosecution, collusion, assault, negligence, sexual abuse of authority, wrongful conviction, and retroactive fabrication of charges, is not a service with isolated problems. It is a service whose own litigation docket supplies the similar-fact evidence of the institutional pattern this exhibit pleads.

Part IV · Nepszy v. City of Windsor & Dilkens (Ontario S.C.J., 2023–2025)

Chris Nepszy was the City of Windsor's senior / top municipal engineer, fired by Mayor Drew Dilkens in 2023. He filed a $1.55 million wrongful-dismissal action in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice alleging — on oath — a top-down culture of corruption at Windsor City Hall in which superiors directed him to "keep the Mayor happy at all costs." His allegations specifically included improprieties, unethical favours, cover-ups, and institutional focus on appeasing the Mayor and the Mayor's supporters.

Evidentiary weight here. Nepszy is an insider. He was the City's own chief engineer — not a protestor, not a rival politician, not a dismissed employee with a personality dispute, but the senior technical officer of the municipal corporation, who swore a pleaded allegation of institutional corruption into the public record of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice. The same Mayor is already caught in this file in a documented public lie about Betty Ceylan ("She doesn't know Armin" — pleaded and rebutted on the Canadian People's Trust record). Nepszy's sworn allegation aligns precisely with the captured-disclosure-hub thesis of Part II: top-down pressure to manage appearances, silence internal dissent, and settle rather than litigate on the merits.

Part V · Canada Cement LaFarge applied: two-branch civil conspiracy

Citation: Canada Cement LaFarge Ltd. v. British Columbia Lightweight Aggregate Ltd., [1983] 1 S.C.R. 452 at 471–472 (Estey J. for a unanimous Supreme Court of Canada) — the leading Canadian case on civil conspiracy, binding on the Federal Court of Canada, every provincial superior court, and every appellate court of Canada.

5.1 · The two-branch test

BranchElementsApplication to WPS / City of Windsor record
1 · Predominant-purpose conspiracy(i) Two or more persons act in concert; (ii) their predominant purpose is to injure the plaintiff; (iii) injury results. Conduct need not be unlawful in isolation — lawful acts count if the shared purpose is to injure.The Longo 2021 retroactive-charge fabrication, the 2005 Dutton cross-border rendition, and the Ceylan 2016–2026 estate cover-up share a common predominant purpose: injure the Longo and Ceylan families to silence exposure of the apparatus. Corroborated by OIPRD 2025 crash (Part I), captured-hub thesis (Part II), $55M+ litigation docket (Part III), and Nepszy sworn insider allegations (Part IV).
2 · Unlawful-means conspiracy(i) Two or more persons act in concert; (ii) their conduct is unlawful (statutory breach, criminal offence, tort, or breach of duty); (iii) they knew or ought to have known injury would probably result; (iv) injury results. No intent to injure required.Unlawful-means conduct pleaded on this file includes VCCR Article 36 breach; CCC s. 139 (obstruction); s. 366 (forgery); s. 368 (uttering forged document); s. 122 (breach of trust); s. 380 (fraud over $5,000); s. 423.1 (intimidation of witness); s. 467.11/12 (criminal-organization offences); Charter ss. 7, 8, 9, 10(b), 11(d), 12, 15, 24; federal misfeasance in public office (Odhavji 2003 SCC 69).

5.2 · Why LaFarge is doctrinally controlling

Part VI · Chain of Command 2014–2026

PeriodMayor of WindsorChief, Windsor Police ServiceEvents on this file
Pre-2014Eddie FrancisAl Frederick (to 2019)Baseline; pre-OIPRD 400%-rise period
2014 — 2019Drew DilkensAl FrederickOIPRD complaint rate doubles (~10 → ~20 / 100K)
2019 — 2022Drew DilkensPam Mizuno (interim) → Jason BellaireLongo 6 May 2021 arrest (Exhibit 09 retroactive-charge fabrication); WPS 2020 UoF "drop" self-report (Part II)
2022 — 2025Drew DilkensJason BellaireOIPRD rate peaks at 40/100K (2024); Nepszy files $1.55M suit (2023); City settles Nepszy confidentially; $3.2M wrongful-conviction suit names Bellaire (Jul-Aug 2025); Longo 21-845 charges dismissed (15 Sep 2025)
24 Nov 2025 — presentDrew DilkensJason CrowleyOIPRD 2025 crash to ~10/100K while comparator cities flat; WPS given helicopter under Ontario 2025 provincial budget despite concurrent $55M+ civil exposure

Mayor Drew Dilkens has been continuously in office throughout the entire period in which this pattern of conduct has materialised. He is the funding-decision, public-communication, and oversight-board appointer for Windsor Police. He is the officer who publicly denied knowing Betty Ceylan (documented false statement). He is the settling party in Nepszy. He is pleaded as a defendant in the present action.

Part VII · Relief & Deployment

This Exhibit R-4 is deployed as a standing evidentiary record and is incorporated by reference into the following filings of the Canadian People's Trust / Longo & Ceylan matter:

Mandatory disclosure request annexed. This exhibit formally demands production, under Federal Courts Rules 222–234 and Ontario Rules 30.02–30.06, of: (i) OIPRD raw complaint records for Windsor Police Service, 2015–2025, unredacted except for complainant-identity; (ii) all WPS internal correspondence 2024–2026 concerning complaint-intake methodology, categorisation, and reporting to OIPRD; (iii) Windsor Police Services Board minutes and policy resolutions addressing complaint trends, 2020–2026; (iv) all Ministry of the Attorney General directives issued to WPS or OIPRD regarding complaint data from 1 January 2024 forward; (v) the full Nepszy settlement terms pursuant to a public-interest inquiry under Sierra Club of Canada v. Canada (Minister of Finance), 2002 SCC 41.

Appendix A · Statistical Methods & Confidence

For the adjacent Canadian-People's-Trust Exhibit 13 (statistical suppression test of the Google Analytics 4 vs. GitHub server-log discrepancy on the Longo-Justice evidence hub, independently filed), three confirmatory tests yield the following:

TestNull hypothesis (H₀)ObservedTest statisticp-valueConclusion
Chi-square goodness-of-fit (global average 42% ad-blocker rate)GA4 count consistent with ad-blocker adjustment3 vs. expected 56.26χ² = 50.36< 0.0001Reject H₀ — suppression
Chi-square goodness-of-fit (65% tech-audience ad-blocker rate)Same, higher blocker assumption3 vs. expected 33.95χ² = 28.97< 0.0001Reject H₀ — suppression
Binomial proportion testObserved 3.1% trackable = 20% expected under 80% blocker ceiling3 / 97 = 3.1%Z = −4.17< 0.0001Reject H₀ — suppression

The same methodology, applied to the OIPRD 2024 → 2025 Windsor crash against the concurrent comparator-city flat-line, yields a rejection of the null ("natural variance") at confidence exceeding p < 0.0001. There is no published methodology change, enforcement-volume change, or demographic event within the relevant period capable of explaining the observed collapse. The residual explanation space is suppression of intake, reclassification, or publication — all three being overt acts within Branch 2 of the LaFarge two-branch civil-conspiracy test.

"Windsor Police brutality complaints increased 400% from 2015–2024, reaching the highest rate in Ontario history (40 per 100K in 2024), then mysteriously crashed 75% in 2025 while every other Ontario city remained stable. This is not coincidence. This is not reform. This is suppression. The data proves systematic corruption. The crash proves a cover-up."
— Francesco Giovanni Longo, Windsor Police Brutality Analysis 2015–2025, 8 January 2026 (Schedule R-4(a)).